By Mohamed Abdurrahman Mohamed
Wednesday April 6, 2022
The electoral
process in Somalia has been dragging on since the last year, due to multiple delays caused
by stand-offs between politicians and technical
teams. This drama seems endless as deadlock continues to disrupt
the process in every stage. The latest is the fallout between PM Roble and the South West state of Somalia which
suspended its cooperation with PM on election
issues. Members of the Federal Electoral Implementation Team (FEIT) have also split into two parties.
This new
dispute was sparked by the announcement of the results of parliamentary elections, in which four seats have been excluded
from the list. In this article, we will discuss
on repercussions and the unintended consequences of long-delayed elections which could
harm the recovery and state-building efforts in the country particularly the
most-likely scenario in which the
economic reform agenda and debt relief efforts may suffer reversals. Hence, the adverse impact of vote delays
and the magnitude of the potential damages that these political stalemates would cause are magnificent and could probably
reverse the significant milestones the country had
painstakingly achieved in recent years. Therefore, politicians should be aware that if the
elections process will not be concluded by May, the price will be higher and the deadlock could cost our nascent state
a decade of hard work. It is
therefore, the progress that has been achieved on the economic reform agenda
and debt relief process in the past 7 years or so are at high stakes!
The country is in
a trap
Somali has come a
long way and reached the
Decision
Point of the Heavily Indebted Poor
Countries
(HIPC) initiative on March 25, 2020. However, despite the
significant technical and financial investments made by the Somali development partners including International Financial Institutions (IFIs) such as the World Bank, IMF, and
African Development Bank (AfDB);
bilateral (development agencies) and multilateral (EU & UN) donors in the past decade, to strengthen public
institutions governance and foster socio-economic recovery and stabilization, the fact on the ground
remains that today, due to repeated poll delays, the stakes could not be higher! The country could lose the level of
progress it has achieved. On 24th
February, Laura Jaramillo Mayor, IMF mission chief for Somalia warned that if a
new government is not formed by May,
the budgetary aid received by Somalia from partners will stop. She noted "Evaluation of IMF support programs must be
completed by May 17, 2022. If it is
not completed by that date, the programs automatically end," Jaramillo
further stressed that an interruption of this evaluation would also affect
the ongoing process of debt relief.
This concern
was echoed by the finance minister Dr. Abdirahman Baileh on several occasions including in his recent interview with
the African Report Magazine after he returned from his trip to Washington DC where he had met with the IMF managing
director Kristalina Georgieva and the WorldBank
vice president for Africa Hafez Ghanem. As well as the Special
Representative of the United Nations
Secretary-General (SRSG) for Somalia, James Swan, and
deputy SRSG, UN
Resident Coordinator and Humanitarian Coordinator, Adam Abdelmoula in their meeting with the finance
minister earlier this week. Although
the EU has already withheld
its budgetary support
to FGS, the World Banks
country manager for Somalia Kristina
Svensson in her recent visit to Mogadishu had a meeting with the US
ambassador to Somalia Larry Andre
Jr. and they discussed “the concern that if a government is not in place soon
the economic reform agenda could suffer a reversal and the debt relief efforts are at risk”.
Moreover, experts
and insiders believe that the government may not be able to pay civil servants’ salaries in May without budget
support from the international partners as the
domestic revenue is not enough
to cover the running costs
of the government. This comes at a critical time that Somali struggles with various economic
hardships including severe droughts
and rising inflation. The humanitarian situation in the country
remains extremely dire
with only 3.8% of a total requirement of $1.5 billion for the
humanitarian response plan (HRP) has been funded so far.
This begs several critical
questions, chief among them are: what is the magnitude
of “collateral” damages that
would cause the long-delayed election process?! Is it possible that this political
deadlock could
wipe out the milestones that have been achieved in the debt relief efforts?! Who will take the responsibility if the
country falls back into instability and turmoil?
In the following lines,
we are going to highlight the ongoing economic
reform programs in the country which are at risk if the
political gridlock continues. Our focus will be on multilateral donors that provide
budgetary support to Somalia, with particular emphasis
on the two main actors in the debt relief process, the IMF
and the World Bank.
Somalia’s re-engagement
with the IFIs
The official
engagement of Somalia with the International Financial Institutions (IFIs)
dates back to the post-independence era of the 1960s. However,
the 1969 coup in which the military
has seized power and subsequently imposed socialism on the nation
alienated these agencies.
But the regime had normalized its relationship with the IFIs again
during the 1980s. This has triggered structural reforms and heavily
advancing loans to Somalia for economic transformation and development. However,
due to multiple factors, the government could
able to pay back the loans. In the aftermath of the collapse of the
Somali state in 1991, the relationship
has been halted due to a lack of official government in the country. Therefore, there has not been an official engagement with the IFIs until the end of the transitional period and the election of the official
federal government of Somalia in 2012. The following year, 2013 Somalia restored its ties with the IFIs
in particular the World Bank and IMF to strengthen government core functions; stabilize and reform key institutions; foster socio-economic recovery and stabilization; provide
financing and technical assistance, and assist the country in the debt relief process for the
realization of the peace-building and state-building goals of the Somali compact.
The recovery and development conundrum
in Somalia has been associated with being a heavily indebted country. Somalia’s
external debt has ballooned from around $2 billion before the civil war to more than $5.3 billion by the end of 2018, due
to interest arrears.
Economic reform
agenda
With the
support of international partners, Somalia has made significant strides in the
debt relief process. This positive
momentum toward the right direction
brings to the nation and its people. The economic and institutional
reform program has eventually yielded fruitful in achieving the remarkable milestone of the decision point of
HIPC. This was a result of hard work
and determination carried out by the consecutive administrations of the FGS
especially the top officials of the
government, civil servants, and technocrats of the relevant financial and economic entities including financial
integrity institutions. However, the greatest credit goes to the current finance minister Dr. Abdirahman Beileh and
his predecessor Mohamed Abrahim
Fargeti. There are commendable achievements that have been accomplished since the approval of the IMF Staff-Monitored
Program (SMP) in 2016. According to the finance minister, key reforms
undertaken include 1. The successful conclusion of the IMF Staff Monitoring
Program (SMP) and the commencement of the Extended Credit Facility (ECF) program.
2. Strengthening of the commitment control system through
the SFMI functionalities. 3. Improvement in the
payment process with the introduction of Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT), 4. Strengthening of treasury single account (TSA) framework. 5. Strengthening the payroll
management and control
with the competition of biometric registration for both non-security and
security staff and also ensuring that all employee salaries are paid directly into their bank accounts. 6.
Preparation of accounts by individual public bodies in full compliance with the Cash Basis IPSAS (2017).
Furthermore, the economic reform agenda comprised
strengthening the institutional capacity of financial integrity institutions in particular the
central bank of Somalia (CBS) and the office
of the Auditor General (OAG).
Also, the formulation and implementation of Federal budgets in line with a set of principles
that have been agreed upon with the IMF under the SMP and ECF agreements including that “the annual Budget of the
FGS must be credible and prepared
based on conservative revenue projections, and the annual budget is limited to
the funds that are under the direct
control of the Federal Government. Hence, projections of grants from donors must be realistic and based on confirmed pledged
grants and ideally
cover discretionary
spending”. Moreover, the new policies and instruments for public financial management (PFM) reforms in Somalia including the Procurement Act have been developed. Besides, other regulations have been also approved including
the PFM bill, revenue management bill, customs bill, and national procurement bill.
But, despite
these tremendous efforts, the budget of the FGS is yet dependent on donor grants and there is a long way to go to achieve
the minimum thresholds for domestic revenue
which is key to sustainable fiscal management. The domestic revenue,
which represents 40% ($247m) of the total budget, is meager and the sustainability of the budget is heavily
dependent on grants.
However, several challenges are hampering increased
domestic revenue mobilization. These obstacles must be tackled
to reduce dependence on aid. There
is always a massive gap between tax forecasts and realization. Most importantly, the tax gap in Somalia
is so huge. According to the FGS, FY2022 Budget
Strategy, “the tax burden only grew by 0.73 percent of GDP between 2016 and
2020. Based on this rate of growth, it would take nearly 49 years to reach a threshold of ten percent of GDP which
is understood to be a minimum floor
needed to ensure developmental progress”
The economic
reforms implemented by the FGS under the IMF guidance
and with the support of the World Bank are indeed remarkable
achievements and can be characterized as huge
strides in the right direction. These efforts have started following the
formalization of the relationship between
FGS and the IFIs. The commencement of the debt relief process
to clear Somali arrears to the WB, IMF, and AfDB
through the HIPC initiative is aimed at availing the FGS to access regular IDA assistance (and other IFIs funds)
which was restricted to access since
the collapse of the state in 1991. Hence, the Somali Multi partner fund (MPF)
was established and activated in
August 2014 to pursue the reform agenda; re-establish basic country systems; strengthen core state
functions including the budget framework and PFM systems and socio-economic recovery; ensure mutual
accountability and provide a platform for coordinated financing for the sustainable
reconstruction and development of Somalia. The
WB is the trustee and administrator of the fund which receives
support and funding
from the European
Union, United Kingdom,
Norway, Germany, Sweden,
Denmark, Switzerland, Finland,
the United States,
Italy, and the World Bank State and Peacebuilding Fund (SPF). Further,
the implementation modalities of the projects
funded under MPF are classified into three categories: recipient-executed investment projects;
Bank executed projects on behalf of the recipient; and analytical/advisory
projects executed by the Bank. However, there are other eligible recipients of the MPF funds including the UN agencies,
sub-national governments, NGOs, and other implementation partners.
Of course,
the MPF along
UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund (MPTF) and African
Development Bank Multi-Partner Somalia Infrastructure Fund (SIF) are pooled mechanisms for The Somalia
Development and Reconstruction Facility (SDRF) which was established in
2014 to serve as a platform for the
FGS and development partners to provide strategic guidance and oversight for development activities in Somalia over a ten-year
period. SDRF “serves
as both a coordination
framework and a financing architecture for implementing the Somalia National Development Plan (NDP), in line with the
principles of the New Partnership for Somalia”.
The MPF resources
were initially directed to funding projects related to PFM reform and strengthening monetary and fiscal institutions, and other core state functions. These projects include RCRF project, DRM & PFMCSP,
CIP, and ICT sector support. However, the scope and scale of projects were developed and expanded.
The first direct
grants to Somalia in two decades
September 25th,
2018 marks another remarkable milestone in the process of normalization of ties between the FGS and The World Bank.
Somali had received its first direct World Bank grant in 27 years after the Board of Directors approved a total
amount of $80 million to fund public
finance reforms ($60M for the RCRF II, and $20M for DRM & PFMCSP II). This
was a clear sign that the FGS had
regained the trust of IFIs, albeit partially. Prior to that moment, and precisely on August 29th,
the bank has produced its first strategy for Somalia in three decades: The Country Partnership Framework
(CPF) (FY19-FY22). Its main goal is to support
priorities in two focus areas:
1- Strengthening Institutions to Deliver Services,
and 2. Restoring economic
resilience and opportunities. The CPF triggered the first IDA Pre-arrears
Clearance Grants for Somalia which
subsequently provided over $250 million to accelerate progress on key reforms and boost the delivery of
basic services and financial inclusion for the Somali citizens. Notable projects in this regard include; the SCALED-UP
project, BIYOOLE, Somali Shock Responsive and Social Safety
Nets, and Somali Electricity Access Project (SEAP).
It’ is also noteworthy that, as trust in Somali institutions grow, the European Union signed a $116m budget support agreement for two and half years with the Somalia government on 14 Oct 2018, which was the EU’s first-ever budget support to FGS.
The Decision point
Building on the progress made in the spheres of economic reforms
and institutional strengthening, Somali has successfully completed the required
(83) benchmarks to reach the decision-point
under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative in March 2020, becoming the 37th country to
reach this milestone. Somalia cleared its arrears to World Bank Group, IMF, and AfDB, and reached an
agreement with the Paris Club on terms of debt relief on 31 March. Also, Somalia has negotiated with other non-Paris
creditors to reach similar agreements. By achieving this critical milestone, the external debt has been reduced from $5.3 billion
to $3.9 billion (78% of the 2020 gross domestic
product (GDP), and this opened the door for
Somalia to access much-needed assistance from IDA, IMF, and other IFIs.
Consequently, according to the
finance minister, since 2020, the WBG has provided around $2 billion of financial assistance to Somalia, to
further strengthen the reforms and deliver basic public services to the people. The decision point also allowed for the
private sector to have access to debt and equity
investments through the International Financial
Cooperation (IFC) (one of the bank’s arms) and most importantly, it
has allowed Somalia to gain political risk insurance provided by the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)
to facilitate foreign direct investments.
However, to achieve complete and irrevocable debt relief, Somalia must fulfill all requirements of the three-year Extended Credit Facility
(ECF) program by IMF and maintain sound macroeconomic policies,
implement its poverty
reduction strategy - the Ninth National Development Plan (NDP9)
- for at least one year. The country
should complete a set of policy measures known as
Completion Point triggers that are aimed at promoting inclusive, long term growth
and poverty reduction.”
Extended credit facility
to Somalia
Upon the successful conclusion of the
second review of the staff-monitored program, which has been endorsed as
matching the
standards of
upper credit
tranche conditionality, Somalia
has reached the decision point.
At the same time, the country embarked on a new IMF supported program (ECF) aimed
at assisting the implementation
of the National Development Plan (NDP-9) and anchor reforms between the HIPC
Decision and
Completion Points.
The
program
comprises structural benchmarks (SBs), indicative targets (ITs),
and
quantitative performance criterion (QPCs).
Moreover, the
three year ECF arrangement was originally approved by the Executive Board of IMF on March 25, 2020, for SDR 292.4 million (about US$395.5), and on November
18, 2020, it was completed the first review of the
Extended Credit Facility (ECF) which enabled the immediate disbursement
of required funds at the time.
However, with the
second and third reviews to be held in mid-May, a new administration should be in place to conclude the review
and confirm its commitment to the economic program. Otherwise, the budgetary aid received by the FGS from development partners could stop and the whole debt relief
program is at risk
A press release
issued by the IMF on 7 March read “Political uncertainty and election delays can result in the automatic lapse of the
IMF-supported program, which will jeopardize the disbursement of budget support grants and derail the timing for
full debt relief at the HIPC Completion Point.”
Nevertheless,
once Somalia reaches the HIPC Completion Point in the next year or so, it is expected that the external debt of Somalia
will be reduced from US$5.3 billion at the end of 2018 to US$557 million.
Completion point triggers are: Poverty reduction
strategy (NDP-9) implementation, macroeconomic stability; public financial and expenditure management;
domestic revenue mobilization, governance, anti-corruption, and natural
resource management; debt management; social sectors (education, health, social safety
net); private sector development (Growth/structural); and statistical capacity
by publishing at least two editions of the “Somalia Annual Fact Book”.
The World Bank funded-projects
in Somalia
A variety of
donor-funded projects are currently being implemented in Somalia. However, to get a clear picture of development projects
that are subject to uncertainty in the case of
continuation of the election
delays, let’s take WB-funded projects as a case study.
The ongoing
WB projects in the country
are funded through
MPF and grants by the International
Development Association (IDA), which is part of the WB group. WB programs and projects in the country are guided by
its country partnership framework and can be
classified into three categories that fall into three different portfolios: 1. Effective accountable Government
portfolio. 2. Enabling economic growth portfolio and 3. Urban infrastructure portfolio.
Projects
financed under the first category, effective accountable government portfolio, which addresses strengthening governance with particular emphasis
on fiscal reforms,
social sector development, and resilience, are eleven
active projects and programs. Seven of them are implemented by the FGS through its different institutions and
federal member states. This category is known as recipient-executed investment projects. The remaining
four are analytical advisory projects with a total
budget of $883.6m co-financed by MPF and IDA
($216M and $667.6M respectively). This is considered the largest portfolio
Active projects are:
1.
CAPACITY
INJECTION PROJECT (CIP): with a budget appraised at US$40 million. The project aims at strengthening the staffing
and institutional capacity of selected line ministries and central agencies to perform core government functions.
2.
CIVIL SERVICE
STRENGTHENING PROJECT (CSSP):
Budget: US$14.5 million.
Objectives: Strengthen basic
functions for payroll, human resources, and policy management in selected
central agencies and line ministries.
3.
3- DOMESTIC
REVENUE MOBILIZATION AND PUBLIC FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT CAPACITY
STRENGTHENING PROJECT
(DRM/PFM): Budget: US$50 million. Objectives: Strengthen systems of domestic revenue
mobilization, expenditure control,
and accountability in the Federal
Government, Puntland State of Somalia,
and Somaliland.
4.
DAMAL CAAFIMAAD:
Budget: US$100 million. Project Development Objective is to improve
the coverage of essential health
and nutrition services
in project areas and strengthen stewardship capacity of Ministries of Health (MoHs).
5. ENHANCING GOVERNANCE DIALOGUE ON SOMALIA: Timeframe:
Budget: US$1.05M. Objectives Improve
policy dialogue and coordination necessary for reform progress, achievement of governance projects’ objectives and governance integration in sectoral operations.
6.
RECURRENT COST
AND REFORM FINANCING (RCRF) PROGRAM: RCRF II and RCRF III with a budget of US$206 million and $68
million respectively. Objectives: Support the
Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) and eligible Federal Member States
(FMS) to strengthen resource
management systems, the inter-governmental fiscal framework, and service delivery
systems in health and education.
7.
A. SOMALIA
SHOCK RESPONSIVE AND SOCIAL SAFETY NETS: SOMALIA
SHOCK RESPONSIVE SAFETY NET
FOR HUMAN CAPITAL PROJECT (SNHCP) Budget: US$175 million. Objectives: Provide
cash transfers to targeted poor and vulnerable households and establish
the key building
blocks of a national shock-responsive safety net system.
B. SOMALIA SHOCK RESPONSIVE SAFETY NET FOR LOCUST RESPONSE PROJECT (SNLRP): Budget: US$115 million.
Objectives: Protect food security and livelihoods of poor and vulnerable HHs affected by the locust outbreak and
strengthen social protection (SP) systems for preparedness.
C. SOMALIA
SOCIAL PROTECTION SUPPORT:
BUILDING BLOCKS TOWARDS
A NATIONAL SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEM (ASA) Timeframe:
Budget: US$2 million, Objectives: Support the Government of Somalia to
develop key
building blocks
of a national SP system and support the design
of a scalable social safety net program.
8.
SOMALI INTEGRATED
STATISTICS AND ECONOMIC PLANNING CAPACITY BUILDING PROJECT. Budget: US$25
million. Objectives: strengthen the national statistical system in the
collection, processing, and dissemination of poverty and selected macroeconomic data to inform development policy and poverty
reduction activities.
9.
SUPPORT TO FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE POLICY DIALOGUE (FGC): Budget: US$2 million. Objectives Provide technical advice
and facilitate policy
dialogue to strengthen transparency and accountability in the areas of strategic public
procurement and concessions, asset recovery, and other selected areas of
financial governance.
10. Somalia COVID-19 Emergency Vaccination Project: Budget:
US$45 million. The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to
support the Federal Republic of Somalia to acquire
and deploy Project COVID-19 vaccines and to strengthen national immunization capacity.
11. Somalia Education for Human Capital Development
Project with a budget of US$40million.
Development Objective is: Increase access to primary education in underserved areas, with a focus on girls, and improve the quality of instruction.
The second portfolio, which addresses economic
resilience and growth,
has five active projects
that focus on long-term
poverty reduction and
inclusive growth. Three
of
these
are
recipient- executed, and two are Bank-executed with a total budget of $487.7m ($44m of MPF resources and $443.7m by IDA resources).
1.
SOMALI ELECTRICITY ACCESS PROJECT (SEAP):
Budget: US$7.2 million.
Objectives Expand access
to electricity in targeted
urban, peri-urban, and rural communities.
2. SOMALI ELECTRICITY SECTOR RECOVERY
PROJECT: Budget: US$ 150 million.
The Project Development Objective is to increase access to lower cost and cleaner electricity supply in project areas and reestablish
the electricity supply
industry.
3. SOMALIA CAPACITY ADVANCEMENT, LIVELIHOODS, AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, THROUGH
DIGITAL UPLIFT PROGRAM
(SCALED-UP): Budget: US$101 million. Objectives Support progress towards
increased access to basic digital financial and government services targeting entrepreneurship and employment,
particularly for women. (Additional financing $75m).
4.
SOMALIA
CRISIS RECOVERY PROJECT (SCRP): Budget: US$187.5 million. Objectives Support the recovery of livelihoods and
infrastructure in flood- and drought-affected
areas and strengthen capacity for disaster preparedness nationwide.
5. WATER FOR AGRO-PASTORAL PRODUCTIVITY AND RESILIENCE, OR ‘BIYOOLE’, PROJECT: Budget: US$42 million. Objectives
Develop water and agricultural services among agro-pastoralist communities in dryland areas of Somalia.
The Biyoole project aims to deliver improved water and agriculture services to agro-pastoral communities in
drought-prone dryland areas of Somalia and improve their productivity and resilience to climate-induced shocks.
The Urban infrastructure portfolio, which aims at building the capacity of Somali municipalities for urban resilience, consists of three active projects,
two are recipient-executed and one is a Bank-executed project, with a
total fund of $121.8m ($71.8m and $50m for
MPF and IDA respectively).
1.SOMALI
URBAN INVESTMENT PLANNING PROJECT (SUIPP): Budget: US$9.77 million. Objectives Provide (a) an assessment of
the feasibility of, and preliminary plans for,
selected urban investment and institutional strengthening activities in targeted cities;
and (b) enhanced project preparation and implementation capacity
of participating agencies.
2. SOMALIA URBAN RESILIENCE PROJECT
II (SURP II): Budget: US$112
million. Objectives Strengthen public service delivery
capacity of local governments and increase access to urban infrastructure and services in selected areas.
The
aforementioned are the total active WB-funded projects in Somalia.
Additionally, there are upcoming
investment projects in this regard including the blue economy development project.
Further, apart from IBRD/IDA finances, the IFC, which is one of the World Bank group arms,
does also currently implement projects related to
private sector development.
Furthermore, it is worth
mentioning that the AfDB is one of the main players in the
economic and financial reform in Somalia.
Besides being among the four actors in the debt relief process
(IMF, WB, EU & AfDB). However, it seems that their projects are not
susceptible to the negative impact of
the ongoing political crises
in the country.
The way forward
Somalia is at a critical junction.
Covid-19, conflict and climate-related disasters
threaten millions of lives
across the country. The political deadlock continues and the donor budget grants are on hold until elections are
completed. Further, donor-funded special projects are also at stake.
The international community is keeping up pressing Somalia
authorities without any concrete results.
Though a
provisional budget of $206m has been approved by the cabinet in March for the running cost of three months, it is most
likely that the government will struggle to pay the salaries of the civil servants and armed forces
in the next month of May. The FGS could borrow money to discharge its commitments
thereby incurring arrears which will breach one of the key conditions of the IMF debt relief programs.
Moreover, the
development partner has been warning repeatedly that Somalia could lose everything it has gained in the
economic reform program
if the election process
is not completed as soon as possible.
Most importantly,
there is a severe drought ravaging Somalia. Apart from its adverse impact on the debt relief process, the political deadlock
drives attention from the ongoing drought which
has been characterized as one of the worst in decades. Thousands of Somali
lives are at risk of starvation. So far,
a huge number of livestock deaths
have been reported.
For the time being, the HRP has got only 3.8% total funds required.
Therefore, we
call on politicians to stop self-promotion and reconsider their mindset. The priority
should be how to provide
support to vulnerable people affected by droughts to avert famine. Therefore, they must show
compromise and reach a quick solution to conclude the elections as soonest as possible and avoid unintentional
consequences of election delays. There
is no doubt that the humanitarian situation in the country could worsen if a
political settlement is not reached soon.
The
responsibility lies on the shoulders of the top leaders of the country, the
political will is the key to solving
the existing problems. The international community also must take the responsibility of ensuring that
donor funds are directed to the
intended targets.
Furthermore, the
sustained political, economic, and institutional reforms undertaken since 2016 are at risk. This requires strong
political leadership to overcome resistance from vested interests.
Finally, the
renewed feud between the members of FIET on one hand and the rift between PM Roble and SWSS over seats excluded from
the list of elected parliamentarians would further
exacerbate the already existing fear that reaching a political settlement on
election issue and the conclusion of
the process would take other several months, thereby increasing the risks
and uncertainty faced by the fragile state of Somalia.
Mohamed Abdurrahman Mohamed, PhD candidate & Economic Analyst
[email protected]